7 Analysis and identification of the problem field
This Clause establishes requirements for the analysis of the territory and the identification of problem fields. The preliminary system of objectives (Clause 5) and the source data (Clause 6) are used. Result: an evidence base for the refinement of objectives on the basis of the results of the analysis, for the vision (Clause 8) and for the project solution (Clause 9). Assessment of effects on the subject of protection and the additional impact assessment — 7.12.
The analysis is performed after Clause 6 and before the refinement of objectives on the basis of the results of the analysis. The Clause does not reproduce the task in 5.8. The depth of the analysis is determined by 5.1.6.
7.1 General requirements for analysis and identification of the problem field
7.1.1 Purpose and tasks of the analysis
The purpose of the analysis is to identify the current state of the territory and the causes of adverse states, and to form an evidence base for the refinement of objectives on the basis of the results of the analysis, for the vision of territorial development (Clause 8) and for the project solution (Clause 9). The analysis ensures the implementation of the principles of Clause 4 and uses the source data of Clause 6.
7.1.2 Comprehensiveness and directions of the analysis
The analysis is performed along the four interrelated directions of Clause 4. Heritage is not singled out as an optional Annex to the general analysis (4.1.2). The analysis shall not be performed along individual directions in isolation.
The types of analysis in 7.2–7.8 correspond to the subclauses of the source data of Clause 6 and are mutually coordinated within the stated directions. The actual model of the functioning of the territory does not coincide with the sectoral division and is cross-sectoral in character (4.5.2, 4.5.5).
7.1.3 Two levels of diagnosis
In the analysis, the level of identification of the state and the level of identification of the causes of the state are distinguished. The analysis shall be focused on the identification of causes, and not only on description. Refinement of the diagnosis is carried out by collecting data at a level below that of the primary diagnosis.
7.1.4 Participation of interested parties in the analysis
Interested parties are involved in the processes of analysis and assessment (4.2.4). Formats of participation — from consultations to joint mapping of values and problems. The results of participation are part of the evidence base for the quality of decisions.
A territorial assessment with the participation of interested parties precedes the refinement of objectives on the basis of the results of the analysis. The preliminary system of objectives has already been fixed and is not deferred until the analysis is completed.
7.1.5 Basis in factual data
The analysis is performed on the basis of the source data of Clause 6 (4.5.6). Where data cannot be obtained, gaps and expert assumptions are recorded, with an indication of the source and the degree of reliability. Decisions taken on the basis of incomplete data shall be accompanied by an assessment of the risks associated with incompleteness of the information (5.8.3).
7.1.6 Diagnostic recording of the baseline
The baseline of the current state is formed by the collection of source data (6.1.2). The results of the analysis record the diagnostic component of the baseline: identified states, causes, hypotheses and forecast trajectories. The diagnostic component is linked to the system of indicators of sustainable development (in accordance with Annex B) and is used in monitoring.
7.1.7 Requirements for documenting the results
Results of the analysis that permit spatial localization are linked to a single spatial model of the territory. For each type of analysis, the methods applied, the assumptions and limitations, and the degree of reliability of the conclusions are recorded. The format of documentation shall enable the results to be used for modelling territorial and sectoral problem fields (4.1.3, 6.9).
7.2 Socio-cultural analysis and consideration of identity
The analysis in this subclause ensures the implementation of principles 4.2.1–4.2.3 and the refinement of objectives 5.2 and 5.4.2.1, and is a continuation of the data of 6.4. The identification of parties carried out at the preliminary setting of objectives (5.2) is not repeated: this subclause analyses and refines the data for the refinement of objectives on the basis of the results of the analysis.
7.2.1 Analysis of interested parties
On the basis of the refinement of data on interested parties (6.4.3), an analysis is performed of interests, the degree of influence, intentions and potential conflicts of interest between groups. Where a matrix of "interests – influence – intentions" (5.2.4) exists, it is refined. The key groups capable of exerting the greatest effect on the achievement of the objectives of sustainable development are identified.
7.2.2 Identification of cultural customs, practices and values
Cultural customs, practices and values of interested parties are identified. The values of residents are mapped at the level of the person for subsequent alignment with the values of the city and the region (4.2.3, 5.4.2). Areas of coincidence and of divergence of the values of different groups of interested parties are identified.
7.2.3 Analysis of identity and sense of belonging
The connectedness of people with culture and the territory is assessed. Identity is analysed as a factor influencing entrepreneurial activity, the cohesion of communities and the readiness of residents for the joint transformation of the environment (4.2.3). Residents' perception of the authenticity of the historic environment is assessed.
7.2.4 Assessment of social cohesion and readiness for changes
The readiness of the population to accept and to participate in socio-economic and spatial changes is analysed. The cohesion of communities is assessed as a condition for the effective transformation of the environment. Transformation of the environment is a complex process and is carried out more effectively by associations or groups of residents (4.2.3).
7.2.5 Assessment of the competence of interested parties
The level of awareness and competence of interested parties in the field of sustainable development and the preservation of heritage is analysed. Needs for the development of competence are identified. It is assessed whether a competent community capable of determining the development of the environment is being formed (4.2.1, 5.2.3).
7.3 Analysis of historical and cultural heritage and its potential
The analysis in this subclause ensures the implementation of principles 4.3.1–4.3.12 and 4.4.1 and of objectives 5.4.4, and uses the data of 6.2 and 6.5.2. The analysis of historical and cultural heritage is performed before the assessment under 7.12 and forms the source data for it.
7.3.1 Analysis of the attributes of historical and cultural value
An analysis is performed of the elements of the subject of protection of the historic settlement by its positions and of the attributes of historical and cultural value, on the basis of the data of 6.2.3. For each element and attribute, the state and the vulnerability are assessed. Interrelations between the layers are determined. Management of sustainable development shall take into account all layers in their interaction (4.3.4). Intangible heritage is analysed under 7.3.3.
7.3.2 Assessment of authenticity and integrity
An analysis of the authenticity and integrity of the historic environment is performed according to the parameters of 6.2.4. Authenticity is regarded as a factor of the sustainability and of the demand for the urban environment (4.3.2). The results of the assessment are a mandatory part of the baseline.
7.3.3 Analysis of intangible heritage
The state, the degree of preservation and the potential for use of intangible heritage are assessed (data of 6.2.5, 4.3.5). Links with tangible objects and territories and the spatial conditions for the transmission of practices are analysed. Intangible heritage is assessed as a potential for the harmonious development of the person, the environment and the economy and as a basis for the positioning of the territory (4.4.3).
7.3.4 Analysis of zones of possible regeneration
The possibility and the advisability of regeneration of lost or degraded elements of the historic environment are assessed (data of 6.2.6). The potential for regeneration is determined taking into account the subject of protection of the historic settlement (4.3.12, 5.4.4, item d). The necessity and the possibility of updating the restrictions according to the conditions of protection of cultural heritage objects are analysed.
7.3.5 Analysis of the socio-economic value of heritage
The contribution of cultural heritage to the economy and the social life of the territory is identified and assessed (data of 6.5.2). Logical chains of the transfer of historical and cultural potential into urban-planning and socio-economic processes are formed (4.4.1). The assessment is performed according to the structure of the argumentation of the proven contribution of heritage: positioning and branding of the territory, social value and development of human capital, economic value, formation of a comfortable urban environment, strengthening of the potential of heritage.
7.3.6 Analysis of the completeness of registration documentation and of investment readiness
The completeness of the registration documentation of cultural heritage objects is assessed: subjects of protection, protection obligations, acts of technical condition, data of cadastral registration, information on encumbrances (data of 6.2.7). The investment readiness of objects and territories is assessed. Gaps in the documentation that impede the involvement of cultural heritage objects in economic circulation are identified. The completeness of the registration documentation is regarded as a mandatory condition for the formation of investment passports (4.4.5, 5.4.4, item c).
7.3.7 Assessment of the degree of formalization of the status of the historic settlement
The presence or absence of approved boundaries of the historic settlement, of an approved subject of protection and of established requirements for urban-planning regulations is analysed (data of 6.2.2). The depth and the specific features of the subsequent refinement of objectives on the basis of the results of the analysis depend on the degree of formalization. Where formalization is insufficient, specific gaps are recorded so that filling them is included among the priority objectives (5.1.2).
7.4 Spatial analysis
The analysis in this subclause ensures the implementation of principles 4.5.2, 4.3.4 and 4.3.6 and of objectives 5.4.3, item b), and uses the data of 6.3.
7.4.1 Analysis of the planning structure
The degree of preservation of the historic planning structure is assessed according to the composition in 6.3.2, including the intra-block structure and the parcellation. Areas of disruption of the historic planning structure are identified. The ratio of preserved and disrupted elements is analysed.
7.4.2 Landscape and visual analysis
View openings, panoramas, visual corridors and their state are analysed. Sectors of visual perception of cultural heritage objects are determined. Conformity to the continuity of development of the compositional and spatial structure of the territory is analysed. Silhouette characteristics, landscape dominants and landmarks are assessed. All landscapes of the territory of the historic settlement are assessed, including everyday landscapes and those in need of recovery (data of 6.3.3, 4.2.2). Where a protection-zone design of cultural heritage objects exists, its landscape and visual materials are used (GOST R 59124–2020). This clause establishes the composition of the analysis of the historic settlement independently and does not transfer to it the methodology of the protection-zone design.
7.4.3 Morphological analysis of the development
Morphotypes of the development, the typology of buildings and structures, the number of storeys, density, materials, structural systems, and stylistic and compositional features are analysed. The historic typology of the development and its adaptive development are analysed. Dissonant objects and elements that disrupt the integrity of the historic environment are identified (data of 6.3.4).
7.4.4 Analysis of engineering and transport infrastructure
The state, the capacities and the degree of wear of networks and facilities of engineering services are assessed. Transport infrastructure and pedestrian and bicycle accessibility are assessed. Infrastructure constraints on the development of the territory are identified. The provision of social infrastructure facilities (education, healthcare, culture, sport and recreation) relative to the standards is assessed (data of 6.3.5). The state of the infrastructure is regarded as a determining factor in the abandonment of territories and objects (data of 6.3.5, 4.1.4).
7.4.5 Analysis of land use and functional zoning
The functional use of territories and objects is assessed. The ratio of residential, public and business, industrial, recreational and other functions is analysed. Vacant, underused and conflicting territories are identified (data of 6.3.6).
7.4.6 Analysis of conformity to the constraints on development of the territory
The conformity of the current state of the territory to the regimes and requirements of the protection zones of cultural heritage objects, to the urban-planning regulations within the boundaries of the historic settlement, and to the subject of protection of the historic settlement is analysed. Cases of non-conformity and of the layering of restrictions are identified (data of 6.7.3, 4.3.8, 4.5.4).
7.5 Socio-economic analysis
The analysis in this subclause ensures the implementation of principles 4.4.7 and 4.4.1, of objectives 5.4.3, item a), and of direction 5.4.5, item g), and uses the data of 6.5, 6.4.5 and 6.4.6.
7.5.1 Analysis of the economic viability of the territory
The macroeconomic indicators of the territory are assessed: employment and unemployment, the structure of the economy by sector, the volume and dynamics of investment, the incomes of the population. Small and medium-sized entrepreneurship is assessed. A comparative analysis with similar territories and with the average values for the region is performed (data of 6.5.1).
7.5.2 Analysis of the investment environment
The investment climate of the territory is assessed. The conditions for attracting private investment into the preservation and development of historic objects and territories are analysed. A retrospective analysis of expenditure by direction is performed as a tool for verifying the realism of the envisaged project solutions: if the cost of the proposed measures exceeds actual outlays over recent years by several times or by an order of magnitude, and there is no answer as to the sources of financing, the sustainability of the project solutions is called into question (data of 6.5.3, 4.4.7).
7.5.3 Analysis of tourism potential and load
Tourist flows are assessed: volume, seasonality, structure, dynamics. Tourism infrastructure, the load on the territory (4.3.11; in accordance with Annex B, B.2.1.6, B.2.2.2) and the impact of tourism on the historic environment and the local community are assessed (data of 6.5.4). Data on tourism are not the only dimension of the value of heritage.
7.5.4 Analysis of quality of life and satisfaction
Residents' perception of the quality of the living environment, of comfort, of safety and of the accessibility of services and facilities is assessed. Residents' satisfaction with the activity of the governing bodies is analysed. The proven effectiveness of existing programmes for solving the everyday problems of residents is assessed (data of 6.4.5).
7.5.5 Analysis of education, culture and creative potential
The potential of the creative and cultural industries is assessed. Personnel potential in the fields of restoration, preservation of heritage and urban planning is assessed. The possibilities of integrating heritage into the creative economy and the creative industries are assessed. Educational programmes and measures in the field of heritage are analysed (data of 6.4.6, 4.4.4).
7.5.6 Analysis of budgetary capacity and sources of financing
The cost of the envisaged measures is correlated with actual budgetary capacity. The revenues and expenditures of the local budget and the expenditures on the preservation of cultural heritage objects are analysed. Federal, regional and municipal programmes in force are analysed. Potential sources of financing are assessed (data of 6.5.5).
7.6 Environmental analysis
The analysis in this subclause ensures the implementation of principles 4.2.2 and 4.3.4, of objectives 5.4.3, items b)–d), and of direction 5.4.5, item l), and uses the data of 6.6. The limits of the load on the territory are taken into account (5.3.3). Separate mandatory climatic requirements are not established by this subclause.
7.6.1 Analysis of the state of the natural landscape and ecosystems
Natural areas, specially protected natural areas, the blue-green framework, including green plantings of common use, are assessed. The biodiversity and the ecological sustainability of the territory are assessed. The analysis is performed for all landscapes of the territory of the historic settlement, including everyday landscapes and those in need of recovery (data of 6.6.1, 4.2.2).
7.6.2 Analysis of the quality of the environment
The quality of atmospheric air, water bodies and soils, and the level of noise, insolation and aeration, are assessed. Sources of adverse impact on the environment are identified (data of 6.6.2).
7.6.3 Analysis of climatic parameters as a factor in the state of the historic environment
The main climatic parameters of the territory as a factor in the state of the historic environment, and the identified impact of climatic factors on cultural heritage objects and the historic environment, are analysed (data of 6.6.3). This clause does not establish a separate mandatory assessment of climatic risks.
7.6.4 Analysis of resource consumption
Energy consumption, water consumption and waste management in the territory are assessed. The potential for optimization of resource consumption is identified (data of 6.6.4).
7.7 Analysis of the regulatory and legal framework and the management system
The analysis in this subclause ensures the implementation of principles 4.3.8, 4.5.4 and 4.5.5 and of the zones of authority (5.3.2), and uses the data of 6.7.
7.7.1 Analysis of the completeness and consistency of the regulatory and legal framework
Gaps, conflicts and layering of restrictions in the regulatory and legal regulation of the territory are identified. The completeness and currency of the established protection regimes of cultural heritage objects are assessed. The coordination of the requirements of the legislation on cultural heritage objects and of urban-planning legislation is analyzed (data of 6.7.1, 6.7.3).
7.7.2 Analysis of the consistency of strategic planning documents
The consistency of the objectives of existing socio-economic development strategies, of the master plan (if any), of the territorial planning documents of the Russian Federation and of a constituent entity of the Russian Federation, of state and municipal programs and of national projects, among themselves and with the sustainable development objectives, is assessed. Contradictions and gaps in the strategic planning system are identified (data of 6.7.2, 5.5.3).
7.7.3 Analysis of the management system
An analysis is carried out of the existing organizational structures, coordination mechanisms and procedures for cross-sector interaction; of the available competence and resources; of the zones of direct management, zones of influence and zones of the external context (data of 6.7.4, 5.3.2). This clause does not establish a maturity scale of the management system.
7.8 Analysis of trends and external factors
The analysis in this subclause ensures the implementation of principles 4.5.2, 4.5.3 and 5.7 and uses the data of 6.8.
7.8.1 Analysis of technological trends
Forecast technological changes capable of affecting the development of the territory and the functioning of its systems are assessed: new mobility models, a change in the structure of the transport fleet, unmanned technologies, and digitalization of urban processes. The time horizons for realization of the trends are assessed (data of 6.8.1, 4.5.3).
7.8.2 Analysis of social and demographic trends
Identified and forecast changes in the population structure, way of life, models of consumption and behavior, and employment structure are assessed. Trends capable of affecting the sustainability of project solutions are identified: urbanization and suburbanization, changes in preferences for the living environment (data of 6.8.2).
7.8.3 Analysis of economic trends
Sectoral and regional economic trends; changes in the structure of the economy, markets and the investment environment; and trends in the development of tourism and the creative industries are assessed (data of 6.8.3).
7.8.4 Comparative analysis with similar territories
A comparative analysis with similar historic settlements and territories is carried out using the standardized indicators of GOST R ISO 37120 [6]; where necessary, an informative correlation with the indicators of GOST R ISO 37122 and GOST R ISO 37123 is used (in accordance with Annex B, B.3.5.2). Best practices in the preservation and sustainable development of historic settlements and data on projects implemented in similar territories are analyzed (data of 6.8.4).
7.9 Inertial forecast
The inertial forecast ensures the implementation of principle 4.5.2 and uses the results of the analysis in 7.2–7.8.
7.9.1 Methodology and forecast horizons
The forecast of potential states of the territory is carried out without taking into account the effects of implementing sustainable development measures. The time horizons of the forecast are determined: short-term — up to and including 3 years, medium-term — more than 3 years and up to and including 6 years, long-term — more than 6 years, in accordance with 5.5.1, item d). In mode A, the inertial forecast covers a period no shorter than the period of the master plan.
7.9.2 Forecast by areas of sustainable development
The inertial forecast is carried out for the four areas of Clause 4: people and community; environment and heritage; heritage economy; management. For each area, the forecast indicators and the probable development scenarios, if current trends continue, are determined.
7.9.3 Forecast of the state of historical and cultural heritage
A forecast is carried out of the change in the state of elements of the subject of protection of the historic settlement and of the attributes of the value of historic territories in the absence of intervention. A forecast is carried out of the dynamics of change in authenticity and integrity and of the dynamics of threats and vulnerabilities of cultural heritage objects and of the historic environment.
7.9.4 Taking identified trends into account in the forecast
The results of the trend analysis (7.8) are integrated into the inertial forecast. The response of territorial and sectoral systems to new trends is modeled. The planning system shall ensure modeling of the response of territorial and sectoral systems to new trends (4.5.3).
7.10 Identification of the causes of negative states and advancement of hypotheses
7.10.1 Methodology for identifying causes
A transition is made from the level of identifying the state to the level of identifying the causes of the state. The diagnosis is refined by collecting information at one level below that of the primary diagnosis. Cause-and-effect links are established between negative states in the various areas of analysis (7.2–7.8). One of the main results of the comprehensive assessment is the advancement of hypotheses explaining the causes of negative states (4.5.2).
7.10.2 Formulation of hypotheses
Hypotheses explaining the causes of negative states of the territory are formulated. Hypotheses are formulated as verifiable statements, with an indication of the data and the verification criteria. For each hypothesis, the data necessary for its confirmation or refutation are determined.
7.10.3 Cross-sector character of the causes
Cross-sector causes of negative states are identified. The actual model of the functioning of the territory does not coincide with the sectoral division and has a cross-sector character (4.5.5). It is analyzed how negative states in one area give rise to problems in others. When urban tasks and processes are decomposed into components, the cultural aspect is integrated into each element of the functional urban model.
7.11 Integrated analysis
The integrated analysis ensures synthesis of the results obtained for the individual areas (7.2–7.10).
7.11.1 Cross-analysis of the areas
Interrelationships, synergies and conflicts between the results of the analysis in the various areas (7.2–7.8) are identified. The results are correlated with the areas of iterative analysis (5.4.5). Priority intersections are determined, taking into account the specific nature of the heritage.
7.11.2 SWOT analysis of the territory
Strengths and weaknesses, opportunities and threats are systematized on the basis of the results of the comprehensive analysis. The key problem fields of the territory are singled out. The SWOT analysis is carried out taking into account all areas of sustainable development and the specific nature of the historical and cultural heritage.
7.11.3 Analysis of risks and opportunities
Risks to sustainable development and to the preservation of heritage are identified, including risks of emergencies, fire risks and climate risks to cultural heritage objects and to elements of the subject of protection of the historic settlement. Opportunities arising from the results of the analysis are assessed. The scale and severity, temporal duration, reversibility or irreversibility, cumulativeness, secondary character and synergistic character of the impacts are assessed. The identified risks are linked to the tasks of ensuring safety included in planning documents.
7.12 Assessment of effects on the subject of protection and additional impact assessment
This subclause establishes the assessment of effects on the subject of protection of the historic settlement and the additional cultural heritage impact assessment (3.3.4). Implementation of principles 4.3.6–4.3.9 and 4.3.11 is ensured. The results of the analysis in 7.3 are used. The assessment is carried out before the vision, the target scenario and the measures of the project solution are fixed; application when selecting the scenario and the measures — 8.5.4 and 9.4.6. At the stages of implementation and monitoring the assessment is carried out iteratively (10.5.2, 11.7.4, 12.4.3).
The assessment does not replace and does not substitute for the state historical and cultural expert review conducted in accordance with Federal Law No. 73-FZ of 25 June 2002 "On cultural heritage objects (monuments of history and culture) of the peoples of the Russian Federation" [1] and Resolution of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 530 of 25 April 2024 [4]. The assessment is not a condition for the issue of a construction permit. International guidelines on heritage impact assessment are taken into account to the extent that they do not contradict the legislation of the Russian Federation, and are not a mandatory methodology of this standard.
7.12.1 Assessment of effects on the subject of protection
The assessment of effects on elements of the subject of protection of the historic settlement is carried out on the basis of the results of the analysis in 7.3 before the vision of territorial development, the target scenario and the measures of the project solution are fixed.
The effect includes destruction of an element, its distortion and the severance of compositional and planning links. An indirect effect does not fall within this clause and is assessed under 7.12.2.
The conclusion of the assessment: compatible or incompatible with the subject of protection of the historic settlement. An incompatible solution is not accepted as a target solution: the customer of the documentation, jointly with the developer, records its exclusion or reworking (8.5.4, 9.1.3, 9.4.6). The option in which no impact is exerted is considered. Compensation is not applied in respect of elements of the subject of protection of the historic settlement (4.3.6).
The assessment is not required for routine maintenance and repair that do not affect elements of the subject of protection of the historic settlement.
7.12.2 Additional cultural heritage impact assessment
The cultural heritage impact assessment (3.3.4) is carried out in addition to 7.12.1 and does not repeat the check of elements of the subject of protection.
The subject of the assessment is the indirect effect on the subject of protection of the historic settlement and on the historic environment in a broader sense. A change in social, economic, environmental and urban-planning conditions that may lead to degradation of the subject of protection or of the historic environment is assessed, including through the load on the territory, displacement of residents, a tourism mono-function, loss of maintenance and care, and environmental deterioration of the surroundings (4.3.9, 4.3.11, 4.2.2). The absence of direct intervention in an element of the subject of protection does not exhaust the assessment under this clause.
The assessment is carried out if a scenario or a measure changes the said conditions. The assessment is not required for routine maintenance and repair without a change in the said conditions.
The conclusion is recorded in qualitative form: the effect is absent, limited or significant. A significant indirect effect leading to degradation of the subject of protection or of the historic environment requires application of the mitigation hierarchy (4.3.6) or reworking of the solution before it is fixed. Mitigation measures are included in the implementation plan (Clause 10). This clause does not establish a second screening in place of 7.12.1 and does not substitute for the state historical and cultural expert review (4.3.6).
7.12.3 Assessment in mode A
In mode A, the assessment under 7.12.1 and 7.12.2 is conducted for each priority project and object located in the territory of the historic settlement or affecting the subject of protection of the historic settlement, and also for changes to functional zones in that territory.
The assessment is completed before the draft master plan is submitted for public discussions or public hearings (5.1.7, item d). The results of the assessment are included in the substantiation of the master plan decisions.
The assessment is also conducted when any changes affecting the historic settlement are introduced into the master plan, including changes for which public discussions or public hearings are not held, and changes in connection with the comprehensive development of the territory (5.1.7, item i).
7.13 Determination of the significance of sustainability tasks and prioritization of problem fields
7.13.1 Criteria for determining significance
When determining the significance of sustainable development tasks and selecting priority problem fields, the criteria of 5.5.2 are applied.
7.13.2 Prioritization of the identified problem fields
The identified problem fields are ranked taking into account the results of the cross-analysis (7.11) and the assessment under 7.12. Where other conditions are equal, priority is given to problem fields with irreversible consequences and to threats to historical and cultural value. When assessing options, cultural value is taken into account on a par with financial value (4.3.3).
7.13.3 Formation of the evidence base
The results of the analysis and of the prioritization are documented as an evidence base for refining the objectives on the basis of the results of the analysis, for forming the vision (Clause 8) and the project solution (Clause 9). Traceability from the identified problem fields to the principles (Clause 4), the objectives (Clause 5) and the data (Clause 6) is ensured. The results of the prioritization are transmitted to interested parties and are updated when conditions change.
7.13.4 Confirmation of the depth of development of Clauses 6 and 7
On the basis of the results of the prioritization, the step of the second stage of determining the depth of development of the documentation is carried out (5.1.6, item a). The initial depth of development of Clauses 6 and 7 is either confirmed or expanded. Expansion is carried out if irreversible threats to historical and cultural value have been identified. The customer of the documentation, jointly with the developer, takes the decision and draws it up as an addendum to the assignment under 5.8, indicating the grounds. The results of the prioritization are taken into account when selecting the measures of the project solution and at step 9.4.7.